Submitted by Steve Schoner on

I do not know if this is the right place to post this.

Nevertheless, I have posted before with this group almost a year prior.

As I stated more than a year ago, over a period of 16 years I wrote a novel entitled "Scarlet Fields."

After literary and historical advice, I have edited it considerably. Those that have read it say that it is astonishing in its depth.

Currently it is in publication at lulu, but I have not obtained an ISBN for it as I intend to find an agent rather than self publish.

Scarlet Fields is a romance novel centered in Maine, and details the 2nd ME and 20th ME volunteer regiments. I have taken great pains to be accurate with the service of these regiments, and the overall details of the Civil War.

What more can I say?

If you wish to preview it, or even buy it for critical review, go to Google and type in ‘John Alexander Miles’ or ‘Scarlet Fields’

Or simply type in on the web search line:

http://books.lulu.com/content/75135

All have told me that it is much better than _Cold_Mountain_ and certainly worthy of publication by a major publisher. On this I shall see. (P.S. The movie "Cold Mountain" stinks. The opening part, on Burnside's Blast at Bermuda Hundred was fantastic... But the rest of the movie... UCK !)

Steve Schoner (John Alexander Miles)

P.S. I would like to send a copy to a 2nd ME re-enactor group for critical review. Are there any 2nd ME's up there in Maine? I was a re-enactor here in Arizona with the 2nd U.S Artillery, Battery B. But due to health problems and age, I no longer re-enact. (Thinking about joining a GAR re-enactor group if there is such a thing)

Forums: 

Wow...

Mr. Schoner I was just at the web sight and read a little of the story. i like it I think I would like to purchase it.
About a 2nd maine group I don't think we have one up here. There is however a 20th maine group.
Just keep an eye on the militia board, and I'm sure you will get a hold of one.

Pvt.J.Thurlow

J.Thurlow

20th Maine

Here's the 20th ME website.

http://endued.tripod.com/20thmecob/

Andy Danish
Armorer
US Naval Landing Party
"Rescuing the Army......Again"

Andy Danish Master at Arms US Naval Landing Party THE SAILOR'S PRAYER : Oh Lord above Send down a dove With beak as sharp as razors To cut the thoats of them there blokes What sells bad beer to sailors.

AAR

I read Mr. Schoner's post advertising his book last year. I was intrigued and decided to take a chance and buy a copy. Unfortunately that copy is now about 9000 miles away, so my comments are from memory. I have good and bad in my review, and I am posting them as my opinion only, I am not a literary critic, just a humble Civil War reenactor and amateur historian. I realize that this was a labor of love by the author and any criticism is tempered by the fact that I doubt I could do as well.

The story line is interesting and original. The "story behind the story". I will not go into details here, as I don't want to ruin it for anyone else who wants to read it. I thought the beginning drawn out and a little too mushy for my tastes. It took awhile to get down to brass tacks. I really didn't want to read a love story as much as I wanted a historical novel. A couple of the things in the story line were a little hard to believe, but allowing for literary license, I could live with them. For example, A family of Southern Society members marrying into one of Maine Yankees? Not impossible, but made me go hmmmmm.

The accuracy in historical detail I found to be superficial. I believe (if memory serves) there may have been some incorrect commands given during the scenes where officers were giving orders to troops. Did the author obtain the commands from a standard work such as Casey's, Gilham's or Hardee? Or did he ask a reenactor who told him the commands, and whose memory and mastery of The School of the Company may have been not up to par that day? I may be mistaken on this and I can't get out "Scarlet Fields" and my copy of Casey's to compare.

The editing needed some work, and there were some grammatical and style errors that should have been ironed out.

It was a better book than I could have put out, and I thought it was a fair job for an unpublished author. I would be hesitant to recommend it though.

Also, the Battle of the Crater did not occur at Bermuda Hundred, but during the Siege of Petersurg and was planned executed by the IX Corps. IX Corps (Burnside) was never assigned to the Army of the James (Butler), who had been at Bermuda Hundred before the Petersburg Campaign. I agree Cold Mountain sucked, but I thought the Battle of the Crater scene was hokey.

In summary, I am a tough critic and I hope the author does well with the book, but I am a stickler for accuracy and detail.

Bob Firth
Late of the 25th Mass

Bob Firth Late of the 25th Mass

North South Marriage

Just a quick comment Brig. Gen. Andrew Jackson 111 CSA the grand son of General Andrew Jackson married Amy Rock from Maine her family grave is within sight of my sewing room windows. Andrew Jackson Jr a fine confederate married Sarah York from a fine Yankee family Jrs. birth brother fought for the North. Now in the same family Capt. Samuel Jackson CSA (younger brother of Andrew 111) when he passed away was engaged to the daughter of the Gov. of GA. Now that does not even get into the North South marriages in my own family. Now on another note I am sorry I have not posted in awhile. CopperHeadAnnie over night went international on it's own so I have been covered up with orders from the United Kingdom can you believe we have brother Confederates over the ocean. Ya'll take care I will see you nest week end. Hawks and Eagles Fly Like Doves CopperHeadAnnie

I don't have the details in front of me but

I believe I have read of several stories of Bath, Maine ship catians amrring into southern families. Some time in the 1850's, the City of Bath was the largest ship owning town by registered tonnage in the United States. Many of those ship's captains frequented southern ports in routine trade.

I don't have a specific number or anything precentage wise. But I know that I can find a handful of cases. I'll look through my books later and see if I can provide references.

In any case, Yankee men marrying southern women did happen.

--
Michael Johnson

-- Michael Johnson

Scarlet Fields and Craters and Such

Steve, you are certainly a good sport, taking my amateur literary criticism as seriously as you did. When I bought that copy I had no idea it was a draft copy. It came all bound and with a nice cover and all. I would have waited another year for the finished product if I had known.

No big deal about the crater; my significant other has frequently denounced me as being a "history nazi", since I always jump in and correct her when she says anything on the subject. I know I am probably very tiresome company in this respect, but I am going to group meetings now and they all say I am improving.

As for marriages between wealthy Yankees and wealthy Southern families in the tense years before the war, how prevalent were they I wonder? I imagine that middle and working class folks got hitched fairly commonly, but with some very entrenched views of "mudsills and mechanics" on the one hand, and of the "slaveocracy" on the other, I would think that the mostly anti-slavery members of Northern Society and the slave owning members of the Southern Society would be quite hostile toward each other, thereby limiting the opportunities for romance.

Good luck on the final product of Scarlet Fields, I certainly admire your persistence and dedication!

Bob Firth
Late of the 25th Mass

Bob Firth Late of the 25th Mass

One Last Suggestion

As for using Hardee's as the reference for Union drill, you may want to consider another reference. After the CW broke out, the author was a serving officer in the Confederate Army. Obviously, the Federals did not want to use a drill manual whose author was a traitor in their eyes.

The most commonly used drill and tactics manual in the Eastern theater was Casey's Infantry Tactics, by Gen Silas Casey. The 1862 edition is the standard reference used by the vast majority of Federal reeneactors today. I do believe that Hardee's is more popular with the Confederate reenactors, but you would have to check with them on that.

OK, I'll shut up now (thunderous applause)

Bob Firth
I have a wealth of useless knowledge.

Bob Firth Late of the 25th Mass

should be one down after bobs.....but........

I was going to post after Bob but the scroll wouldnt go any farther for some reason.
The common belief is that all rich northerners or the most part of them thought Slavery was an abomination, but even back then we were a mobile society re to Josh Chamberlins Wife Fanny, she taught school in millidgeville Ga. for a time and in letters to Joshua pretty much stated she didnt have much proplem with it... the average Foot soldier was not necessarrilly opposed to slavery in as much as the seperation of the union mattered more... the chance of marriges occuring between richer Families would be just a common as in any class of society.. and not every rich southern Family made money directly from owning slaves.....
Seamus

"it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifing......nothing"
MacBeth

PRIMA NOCTA

Hardee's

That must be the difference between 1862 and 61. Hardees was available off the shelf in 61, and it does stand to reason it would have been used by the Feds because there was not much else at that time. Good point Steve.

Bob Firth
Late of the 25th Mass

Bob Firth Late of the 25th Mass

Explaining Drill

Steve,

Now that I think of it, how do you explain drill and proper commands for an audience that doesn't do this as a hobby? It must sound like Greek to the layman. It takes me at least six times reading through some of the commands in any drill manual to understand what the author was talking about, and even then you really don't get it till you actually do it. Good luck on that one!

As for artillerymen having to know infantry drill, I would expect that they would have to be proficient in the schools of the soldier through possibly the company, or at least be familiar with it. In some instances, they definitely did learn everything up to brigade level evolutions. This is the case with the heavy artillery regiments which originally garrisoned the forts around Washington. In 1864, the decision was made to reassign them to the Army of the Potomac primarily, and use them as infantry. They still retained their title as heavy artillery, but were in fact used as regular infantry. You will see them in the order of battle at Cold Harbor, where they suffered appalling losses.

I'd check with an artillery expert and see what they did and didn't normally concern themselves with in respect to infantry drill.

Bob Firth
Late of the 25th Mass

Bob Firth Late of the 25th Mass

Hardee's

Since my copy of Hardee's is about 8000 miles away I can't refer to it to give you an opinion as to firing by rank. I'll do a web search and see if I can find the reference. However I will venture to say that which rank fires first is up to the commander. Tactically I doubt it matters much unless you are executing a tactical withdrawal by rank, so then it would make sense for the rear rank to fire first. I am only hypothesizing and I think I need to refer to the manual at this point.

I think at this time the order to load would already have been given some time previously. Usually, just before action but not yet in range of the enemy, the command would be something like:
"Attention, company!"
"Load at will, load!"

For your purposes, I would agree that getting bogged down in the mechanics would be too tedious for the average reader, and you have to carefully judge what to leave in and what to leave out.

Bob Firth
Late of the 25th Mass

Bob Firth Late of the 25th Mass

Fire by Rank

Here it is according to Hoyle:

"To fire by rank.
283. The fire by rank will be executed by each entire rank, alternately
284. Re instructor will command:
1. Fire by rank, 2. Squad. 3. READY. 4. Rear rank, 5. AIM
6. FIRE. 7. LOAD.
285. At the third command, the two ranks will take the position of ready, as prescribed in the direct fire.
286. At the seventh command, the rear rank will execute that which has been prescribed in the direct fire, and afterwards take the position of ready.
287. As soon as the instructor sees several men of the rear rank in the position of ready, he will command:
1. Front Rank. 2. AIM. 3. FIRE. 4. LOAD.
288. At these commands, the men in the front rank will execute what has been prescribed for the rear rank, but they will not Step off with right foot.
289. The instructor will recommence the firing by the rear rank, and will thus continue to alternate from rank to rank, until he shall wish the firing to cease, when he will command, cease firing, which will be executed as heretofore prescribed."

Hardee clearly states that the rear rank should fire first. I have been racking my brain for the reason, and the only thing I can think of is that it makes transition to retrograde movements easier. I think that Hardee may also have been purposely keeping the commands to a minimum, so he arbitrarily makes it understood the rear rank will fire first as part of the drill, rather than adding another command specifying which rank will fire first.

Also, at the command "ready", BOTH ranks take the "ready" position, with the rear rank only performing the next commands of "aim, fire, and load". It is interesting that Hardee waits for the rear rank to be just about complete in reloading before he orders the front rank to fire. This is probably to ensure that the company has at least half of it's weapons loaded in the event of an unexpected charge from the enemy.

I could talk about this stuff all day, no wonder my gal says I'm a wealth of useless information.

Bob Firth
Late of the 25th Mass

Bob Firth Late of the 25th Mass

Aw... c'mon Bob.

... whadda YOU know?
What you over actually fighting a WAR or something???

By the way bro.... keep your head down!

2nd Lt Eric R. Reeder
United States Army
Corps of Topographic Engineers
"Hawks and Eagles fly like Doves"

2nd Lt Eric R. Reeder United States Army Corps of Topographic Engineers "Hawks and Eagles fly like Doves"

2nd ME

Steve,

When you refer to the "official" history of the 2nd MVI, I assume you are referring to a regimental history.

In the years following the war, a "regimental history" was written about just about every regiment, north and south, usually by a former member or commissioned by the veterans themselves. What this means is that authors of varying talent wrote these histories. Some are great and fanrastic reading, loaded with anecdotes and information. Some are absolutely horrible, taking events and regiments that are the most fascinating of the war and making it about as interesting as watching paint dry.

The good news is that the deluge of memoirs and diaries written by the Soldiers is often much better than the official histories. My favorite is "The Rebel Yell and Yankee Hurrah", by John West Haley, Co. I, 17th Maine Vol. Inf. I'm partial to this memoir because he served in the same company as my G-G Grand uncle, but most importantly because he is so brutally honest and funny.

I would bet dollars to donuts that there is some great primary source material floating around about the 2nd Maine in the form of diaries and memoirs. Those would be worth truckloads of official histories and provide tons of insight on events, personalities and daily life.

There are also some great works of a generic nature which shed so much light on daily life in the Army during the war. If you haven't done so already, these are "must reads":
"Hardtack and Coffee" by John Billings.
"Corporal Si Klegg and His Pard", by Wilbur Hinman.
"Company Aytch" (for a Confederate perspective), by Sam Watkins.

If you want a great book on CW tactics and operational doctrine, written in language you can understand, I recommend "The Bloody Crucible", by Brent Nosworthy. I like his views and analyses of why commander's and units did what they did.

Pvt. Bob Firth
Co. F. 13th Massachusetts Vol. Inf.

Bob Firth Late of the 25th Mass

Northern Men and Southern Women in marriage

Okay, I mentioned a week or so ago that i would find and add to the discussion of marriage. The following is at least one reference.

Many Bath ship-owning houses had branches in the Crescent City. Many Bath men had found homes there, and not a few shipmasters had married into southern families. Leading men of the city numbered among their valued friends citizens of New Orleans, Mobile, Charleston, and other parts of the deep south. As the war broke, Bath ships lay in many of the Southern ports.

From Chapter XXVI (page 214) of The Edward Clarence Plummer Hostory of Bath Maine, by henery Wilson Owens, A.B. Published originally in 1936 by the Times Company of Bath, Maine.

It's interesting to note that Bath was so closely tied to shipping to and from the south that in the months of turmoil prior to April of 1861 the sentiement in Bath seems to have been very much against any conflict. They wanted status-quo if it would protect the investments and trade they had with slave states.

But everything changed with the firing on Fort Sumter. Bath's contributions stand up against those of any cities. And when you consider that the cities wealth went overseas with the registry of many ships to foreign ports or ships lost to Confederate Raiders that the city's power was never fully restored.

Anyway, that's a little tid-bit on the marriage issue. And my two-cents on bath history.

--
Michael Johnson

-- Michael Johnson

2nd ME

Those books I mentioned are just for background and are what I use in developing my Federal impression. "Si Klegg" is very entertaining, as well as informative.

Sounds like a definitive history of the 2nd ME needs writing also. Most of the primary sources are probably in the state archives and local town libraries.

Bob Firth
Late of the 25th Mass

Bob Firth Late of the 25th Mass